We are searching data for your request:
The age of computer technology makes us live “faster”. More information, the minimum time to remember it and all that remains is a little time for entertainment. Many spend this time on their hobbies, others are completely absorbed in social networks and the Internet, and still others prefer popcorn and a good movie.
Films today are shot at a frantic pace - several hundred films of different genres are released a year. Some of them present a fictional story, others tell about real events of the past, and some are film adaptations of books. Our kind paper books, for the sake of which you can take your eyes off the monitor or TV screen and devote a little time to reading.
Today, opinions are divided as to which is better: a book or a movie. You can bring a lot of arguments in defense of one or another way of knowing the world and self-development. So let's start with the benefits of motion pictures.
Modern fast life for some people does not leave time for reading. A fictional film is an opportunity to relax, because while reading, the human brain performs complex operations.
It seems to us that we are resting while reading, but what does the brain need to "convert" letter symbols into images that arise in the imagination. This is not to mention the fact that you need to feel the emotions and empathize with the heroes, because this is the essence of what has been written.
The book makes the brain work, which is good, but the transformation of letters into images sometimes becomes an obstacle to the emotional saturation of the brain to the extent that a film strip can. A huge brain job is to understand what the author of the work wanted to say?
With the film, everything is simpler: you don't need to imagine anything here: streets, cars, costumes, even the characters themselves have already been created by those who worked on the tape. A movie fan only needs to follow the plot and delve into the essence of experiences and things. Thanks to the created images, sounds, environment, a person does not need to think, but only to enjoy watching. By the way, the viewed plot is remembered much brighter and for a longer period than the one read.
It is difficult to remember the book completely - only the most important moments remain in the memory. For some, the problem remains breaking the plot into chapters, where each previous one ends with the most interesting, and each subsequent one begins with something aloof. This confuses the mind, the person does not receive moral satisfaction and only seeks to find out what happened next, not paying attention to the important, but now not interesting moments at the beginning of the new chapter. The film is remembered almost completely, since there are no “breaks” for chapters. Events smoothly climax, accompanied by music and special effects, sometimes even individual phrases are remembered.
There is an opinion that films are preferred only by narrow-minded people who neglect books and see them as unnecessary waste paper. It's just that some people like one thing, others another, some just don't like reading. The reason for this may even be psychological factors, for example, in childhood, parents forced to read and study a lot, which led the child's consciousness to rejection of literature. The school curriculum involves reading all genres of literature, and if a person likes only science fiction, he will not focus on novels.
As for books, one thing is known: reading is useful. It develops imagination, makes you think, worry, increase your vocabulary. Many people who have read a book and then watched a film based on it are disappointed. The main characters didn’t seem like that, the setting was different, let alone the fact that half of the book’s plot is simply missing from the script! But do not forget that some volumes of 5-6 hundred pages simply cannot be squeezed into the tight framework of an hour and a half film. If you want a complete picture, read the original.
The film is always reworked with the help of a screenwriter, director, so the film is always presented from the point of view of the people who worked on the plot. This is the transmission of history, roughly speaking, through an intermediary. The point of view of the author of the picture may not coincide with yours, it seems to be imposed on the viewer, so the film and the book are best perceived as two different works.
Be that as it may, the richness of the description in the book cannot be compared with what the director of any, the best and most high-quality picture, manages or is able to convey. In films, directors almost always include moments that could interest the reader and make him watch to the end. The book, however, often conveys the plot as it is. Of course, it is not complete without intrigue, there are works that are simply "swallowed" in 1-2 evenings.
The film and the book are still perceived and evaluated differently. After all, these are even different forms of creativity that simply cannot be compared. There are film ideas that have never been embodied in a written version, and works that may not become the basis for writing a script for another melodrama or detective story.
There are moviegoers who do not refuse to read works of interest to them, and literature lovers are not averse to having fun in the cinema while watching the next premiere. But there are no perfect films, no matter how talented the director and actors are. Therefore, cinema will never be able to supplant books from human life. Classics are classics. Whatever the screen version, many works will still be better than the film.
Watch movies, read books. One does not interfere with the other, any kind of someone else's creativity allows a person to develop. So why not get information from many sources.